Murdoch Paper Warns the GOP: Ignore Trump’s Power Grabs at Your Peril

News Image
Trend USA Murdoch Paper Warns GOP: Ignoring Trump's Influence Could Backfire

Murdoch Paper Warns GOP: Ignoring Trump's Influence Could Backfire

President Donald Trump boards Air Force One at Morristown Airport on September 14, 2025 in Morristown, New Jersey.
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

The Wall Street Journal, a prominent publication owned by Rupert Murdoch, has issued a stark warning to the Republican party. According to the Journal, allowing President Donald Trump to install loyalists in key positions within the Federal Reserve could have serious long-term consequences. Let's dive into the details of this cautionary message.

Potential Repercussions of Political Influence on the Fed

The Wall Street Journal editorial board specifically pointed to plans to confirm Stephen Miran, a White House aide, to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. The concern is that this move could set a dangerous precedent. If Republicans allow this now, what's to stop a future Democratic president from doing the same? This could fundamentally alter the perceived independence of the Fed, an institution crucial to maintaining a stable economy. The suggestion is that the GOP “might regret” the next time there’s a Democratic president, “which there will be, maybe as soon as 2029.”

Miran is expected to fill the vacancy left by Adriana Kugler's resignation in August, while simultaneously retaining his role as chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers. This dual role raises questions about potential conflicts of interest and the overall independence of the Fed's decision-making process.

The Senate is expected to vote Monday to confirm Stephen Miran just before the central bank has its next meeting. / Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
The Senate is expected to vote Monday to confirm Stephen Miran just before the central bank has its next meeting. / Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Trump's Long-Standing Tension with the Federal Reserve

It's no secret that President Trump has had a tense relationship with the Federal Reserve, particularly with Chairman Jerome Powell. Trump has repeatedly accused Powell of holding back on interest rate cuts for political reasons. This pressure on the Fed highlights a broader concern about the politicization of an institution designed to be independent from political influence.

The Journal's editorial board emphasizes that if Miran continues to serve as a White House aide while participating in Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings, his independence would be compromised. This raises serious questions about the integrity of the FOMC's deliberations, especially when it comes to making decisions about key economic policies and interest rates.

The Long-Term Implications for the Republican Party

The Wall Street Journal frames the move to confirm Miran as another example of Republicans prioritizing short-term political gains over the long-term implications of their decisions. They argue that failing to resist what they see as Trump's overreach of executive power could ultimately harm both the GOP and the country in the future. The editorial described the move as another “tragedy” in which Republicans have failed to “look beyond short-term tactical political calculations to the implications of their decisions for the long term” during the Trump years.

Economic analysts are closely watching these developments, as the Federal Reserve's decisions have a significant impact on everything from inflation to job growth. Maintaining the Fed's independence is seen as essential for ensuring a stable and predictable financial system.

White House deputy press secretary Kush Desai countered by stating that Miran would be taking an unpaid leave of absence and would have no White House access during his service on the Fed, affirming his compliance with the law.

Ultimately, the warning from the Wall Street Journal serves as a reminder of the importance of checks and balances in a democratic system and the potential dangers of allowing political influence to undermine the independence of crucial institutions like the Federal Reserve. The future impact of this decision remains to be seen, but the debate highlights the ongoing tension between political power and economic stability in the United States.

```

Post a Comment

اكتب ما تريد هنا لا تتكاسل

Previous Post Next Post