Bondi’s DOJ Censors Study Showing Who Commits Political Violence

News Image
Trend USA Controversy as DOJ Removes Study on Political Violence

Controversy Erupts: DOJ Removes Study Highlighting Far-Right Extremism

A recent study from the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), a research agency under the Department of Justice's (DOJ) Office of Justice Programs (OJP), has sparked controversy after its removal from the OJP website. The study, dated June 2024, focused on domestic extremism, and its findings are now fueling debates about political violence and censorship.

Attorney General Pam Bondi with President Trump
Attorney General Pam Bondi (left) pictured with President Trump. (Getty Images)

The now-deleted study highlighted a concerning trend: "militant, nationalistic, white supremacist violent extremism has increased in the United States." Furthermore, it stated that "the number of far-right attacks continues to outpace all other types of terrorism and domestic violent extremism" and that "since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists."

This revelation is particularly sensitive given the recent shooting of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, an event that ignited a flurry of accusations and counter-accusations regarding the source of political violence in America. While some pointed fingers at the "radical left," the study's findings suggest a more complex picture. The study also notes that "no single profile accurately captures the characteristics of the individuals who commit extremist and hate crimes."

The removal of the study has raised serious questions about transparency and potential censorship. A link to the study on the OJP website now leads to an error message ("The requested page could not be found"). Luckily, an archived version of the 13-page report is still accessible via the Wayback Machine, allowing the public to review its findings.

President Trump, among others, has publicly blamed the "radical left" for inciting violence, particularly in the wake of the Kirk shooting. He stated that groups "on the left" were under investigation. Similarly, Vice President JD Vance and Stephen Miller echoed these sentiments on Kirk's podcast, pointing to the growth of "left-wing extremism." Vance even claimed, without providing evidence, that "most of the lunatics in American politics today are proud members of the far left."

However, critics argue that such statements ignore the data presented in the now-removed NIJ study, which indicates that far-right extremism is a significant and growing threat. While the study acknowledges that extremism can come from across the ideological spectrum, its findings on far-right violence are undeniable.

The suspect in the Kirk shooting, Tyler Robinson, has been described as subscribing to "left-wing ideology," but a criminal indictment offers limited details to support this claim. Regardless of the suspect's motivations, the controversy surrounding the removed study underscores the importance of unbiased research and open discussion about the roots of political violence in the United States. This is a developing story, and we will continue to provide updates as they become available.

What do you think about the removal of this study? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

```

Post a Comment

اكتب ما تريد هنا لا تتكاسل

Previous Post Next Post